One model, two schedules. Scrub the date to follow steel, concrete and the handoffs between them.
An example to question before the real schedule exists. The grid and framing come from public 2019 OSU College of Osteopathic Medicine at the Cherokee Nation drawings. The schedules and conflicts are hypothetical, built for learning and discussion.
Learning model only. For education and discussion, not for planning or executing real work. The schedules, quantities and conflicts are illustrative. This is not an engineered erection plan, lift plan or approved project schedule.
Build something you can argue with before the real schedule exists. This study uses AI to help turn two sample schedules into one 4D view of steel erection and concrete placement, so you can question the sequence, crew handoffs and conflicts.
The grid and framing are based on public 2019 bid drawings for the OSU College of Osteopathic Medicine at the Cherokee Nation in Tahlequah, Oklahoma. Structural drawings: Chavez-Grieves. Architect: James R. Childers Architect.
The schedules and conflicts are hypothetical. Bays are simplified; member sizes, piece weights and concrete quantities are illustrative. Crew allocations, cure times and crane capacities are modeled assumptions. The Data & rules tab explains how the handoffs are found; Pieces lists the picks and crane-chart references.
For learning and discussion. This is not a lift plan or a project schedule. Crane capacities are interpolated from published reference charts for demonstration only. Real lifts require the manufacturer’s charts for the actual configuration and a qualified lift planner.